During Tuesday’s Presidential Debate at Hofstra
University, a member of the audience asked what the candidates planned to do to
“limit the availability of assault weapons.”
The question most likely referred to the shooting
this summer in Aurora, Colorado, where James Holmes used a Smith & Wesson
M&P15 semi-automatic rifle, along with a pistol, shotgun, and other
weapons, to attack people at a Dark
Knight Rises movie screening. 58 people were injured and 12 were killed,
including 6-year-old Veronica Moser-Sullivan.
Holmes purchased all of his guns legally at
Colorado sporting goods stores. While assault weapons like the one Holmes
bought had been outlawed in 1994, the assault weapons ban expired in 2004, and
Congress declined to renew it. Holmes’ legally-purchased assault rifle was
capable of firing 100 consecutive shots; a deadly weapon designed for war
combat with power far beyond any conceivable non-military needs.
Governor Romney reaffirmed his alignment with
conservative gun rights positions, and redirected the topic to automatic
weapons, instead of assault weapons: “I'm not in favor of new pieces of
legislation on guns and taking guns away or making certain guns illegal. We of
course don't want to have automatic weapons, and that's already illegal in this
country to have automatic weapons.”
Fully automatic weapons are legal to own in the
United States, but are very tightly regulated by The National Firearms Act of 1934, the Gun Control
Act of 1968 and the 1986 Hughes Amendment. Under these regulations, only
automatic weapons manufactured and registered with the federal government
before 1986 can be bought, owned and sold, and purchasing one requires an FBI
background check.
However, Romney had very little to say about
assault weapons, the original question topic. Instead, he mainly focused on the
idea that changes in culture are needed to reduce gun violence. He mentioned,
in particular, education and family structure. “We need moms and dads helping
raise kids wherever possible,” he said, and added that before having children,
people “ought to think about getting married to someone.” This was likely a
message to more conservative voters who believe that changing values about sex
and marriage, including tolerance for homosexuality, are the true causes to
larger problems in society, including violence. This point also helps resolve a
potentially serious issue for those that argue for more gun rights, by
reconciling support for more gun accessibility with an opposition to violence.
However, the evidence has not shown a connection between single-parent families
and gun violence. See Murnan, J., Dake, J. A. and Price, J. H. (2004), Association
of Selected Risk Factors with Variation in Child and Adolescent Firearm
Mortality by State. Journal of School Health, 74: 335–340.
President Obama, on the other hand, did not take a
particularly strong position for more gun control. “We're a nation that
believes in the Second Amendment,” he said. And though he did mention the
Aurora shooting and supported getting “an assault weapons ban reintroduced,”
Obama also seemed more interested in non-regulatory approaches to reducing gun
violence such as education and “making sure we catch violent impulses before
they occur.”
So returning to the original question on whether
much is being planned to reduce availability of assault weapons, the real
answer seems to be “very little, if anything,” under either candidate.
But what has gone mostly ignored in this
discussion is that availability of weapons may become a moot issue by the end
of the decade, as the internet and new technology increase access to deadly
weapons beyond what any regulatory approach may be able to keep up with. In
August, an engineer claimed to have printed a working gun using a personal 3D
printer. And a UT Austin Law student has been seeking funding for a
crowdsourcing project to make 3D gun printing easily accessible to anyone via
the internet. As 3D printers become inevitably cheaper and more sophisticated,
and eventually able to print metal objects affordably, even strict gun
regulations may become completely ineffective. It is worth exploring, then,
whether there may be any other effective approaches to reducing violence and
deaths from increasingly powerful, and available, weapons.
By Leonora Camner