Secretary of
Defense Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin
Dempsey recently issued a memo purported to pave the way for more women to
serve in direct combat. The memo reversed
the 1994 DOD “Direct Ground Combat Definition and Assignment Rule” which
precluded women from serving in direct combat roles. The memo also opened military occupational
specialties (MOSs) previously open only to males to women.
Though the
memo has made headlines around the world it was behind the times. It was less groundbreaking and more
acknowledging reality. Women have been
serving in convoy guards and security forces for years. These roles, in everything but name, are
combat roles. More to the point, the
wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were a turning point in warfare. There are no more front lines. All territories are in play. More than 150 women have died in combat since
2001 despite DOD policy that women did not serve in combat.
Despite the
fact women already serve in combat there remain some practical difficulties to
making it “official.” Perhaps the most
practical of concerns: body armor. The
body armor typically used by U.S. Army soldiers consists of an Outer Tactical
Vest (OTV) and two Small Arms Protective Insert (SAPI) ballistic plates. The plates are ceramic, very hard, and not
designed for even a little female comfort.
Maybe the acknowledgment by the DOD will allow them to purchase body
armor in both men’s and women’s sizes.
Neither the technology of shaping nor the female form is a recent
development.
The women in
the military conundrum began long before the 1994 rule. One memo won’t be enough to put servicewomen
on an even plane with servicemen. Women
in the military remain in near-constant danger of sexual harassment, sexual
assault, and rape. Hopefully the memo is
the first step of a concerted effort to realize
gender equity in our armed forces, not merely equity in theory.
No comments:
Post a Comment