We live in an age where police chiefs are seeking funding to purchase drones for
domestic surveillance, where fusion centers indiscriminately collect information about us
in mega-databases around the country, and Congress has granted the President the power to indefinitely
detain U.S. citizens – all in the name of national
security.
It’s rather remarkable, then, that in Monday’s
Obama/Romney foreign policy debate – where we heard how everything from math
teacher shortages to Iranian centerfuges impact national security – there was
not one word about how civil liberties might affect our national security
policy.
The third party candidate debate –
hosted by Larry King
the night after the last Obama/Romney debate – had a
much different tone, and included serious discussion about PATRIOT Act repeal,
cessation of drone strikes, and the status of civil liberties under the NDAA. Remarkably
– as The Atlantic’s Conor Friedersdorf lauds – these candidates, “so
ideologically diverse” agreed that “civil liberties are being trampled on by
Democrats and Republicans.”
Given the robust
discussion of the relationship between national security and civil liberties at
the third party candidate debate, the silence in the Obama/Romney debate is
even more striking.
Perhaps, the silence is an extension of David Sirota's analysis of DNC Chairwoman's Wasserman Schultz’s profession
last week that she had never heard of Obama's widely reported "kill
lists" (which were in the mainstream media as recently as this week) –
the predictable result of a political duopoly
that so fundamentally agrees on extra-constitutional national security and
civil liberties policies, that those policies are no longer permitted to be
part of any “serious” national political discussion.
Do we live in an age
where the major political parties consider civil liberties and national
security inappropriate for serious discussion? I certainly hope not.
We, the people, must
stand together and demand some serious discussion on these issues, or pretty
soon, the Department of Homeland Security will roll out its new
technology to scan our bodies with a molecular scanner from 164 feet away – and we won’t have even made mention of our
concern.
By Kali Cohn
No comments:
Post a Comment